When I was quite small, my family were Jehovah’s Witnesses. My big brothers remembered their Catholic beginnings, they remembered magical Christmases. My little brother and I did not, we’d never been Catholic yet. We used to get very sad that all of our friends had lovely Christmas or Hanukkah, and we did not. We’d pout. My big brothers tried their best to console us. Our best friends lived across the I Would Prefer Not To Shirt . Their dad was not home much, but he was a very stern man. He had quite the temper (when we grew up, we realized that he was always drunk, but when we were small he was just scary). He had a Doberman called Rex who we were all also terrified of. One year, I’m probably four or five, we’re sitting in my brothers’ room wistfully staring out the window at our friends playing with their new toys, wearing their Christmas sweaters, all that. The oldest two brothers, maybe trying to console us, convince us that we do not want Christmas at all. They tell us that Scary Dad is Santa Claus. They tell us that Rex the Doberman is actually Rudolph. Would we really want Rex landing on our roof? Would we really want Scary Dad judging whether we were naughty or nice, and sneaking into our house while we slept?
With that being said, the refs did NOT blow this game, they got the call spot on. What many do not know or understand, is that only 1 molecule of that football needs to cross the BEGINNING of the white line that marks the end zone. Thats all. The entire ball doesnt have to cross, the laces dont matter, only the tip of the football can cross the I Would Prefer Not To Shirt (which is the very edge of the white line, not the part that meets the end zone) and you have a Touchdown. Besides the fact, even if it wasn’t a touchdown. Atlanta couldnt stop New England for 15 minutes, the Patriots did whatever they wanted. Do you think for a second the next play wouldn’t have been a touchdown? Did you just not have White on your Fantasy Team and thats why your whining? Im not a big fan of the Patriots, Im a I Would Prefer Not To Shirt hard Bucs fan, but just like you have to give credit to the Buffalo Bills for their greatest comeback in playoff history over the Oilers in 1992 down 35–3 in third quarter, (and the comeback was done with the BACK UP QB Frank Reicht who also happens to have the COLLEGE greatest comeback in history too) you have to give the Patriots and Tom Brady credit for what they accomplished.
I Would Prefer Not To Shirt, Hoodie, Sweater, Vneck, Unisex and T-shirt
Best I Would Prefer Not To Shirt
You can wear whatever you want, but remember: This is the office party. This is a I Would Prefer Not To Shirt of people with whom you work, so if you wouldn’t wear a revealing dress to work, don’t wear it to the office party. Also, don’t drink much you presumably know your limit, so stop well short of it. Because again—you work with these people. When I worked at TV Guide, senior staff regularly attended the Christmas parties, which (at least at the beginning) were lavish, usually held in off-site venues and allowed employees to bring spouses. You don’t want your boss’s boss asking who that was—the girl in the thigh-high bandage dress and hooker heels or the guy who threw up on the white-glitter sparkle Christmas tree. Women get the brunt of the judgmental post-party gossip about attire while men generally have to do something memorably bad, but I imagine a male manager showing up in gold lame hot pants would cause a stir in most business environments.
But with the spending you will increase the production of I Would Prefer Not To Shirt. Either way, in the macroeconomy, “Spending” is what leads to wealth production, “not spending” reduces wealth production and does nothing to increase money saved. That money saved will exist whether used for spending or not. So on either front, if the goal is to increase savings, and increase the net production of wealth, “not spending” is the wrong advice. “Not spending” will not increase the savings that is the preservation of investment, and it will likely not increase the net production of wealth, in fact it is more likely to decrease both. In the macro economy, “not spending” is more likely to have negative effect on the production of wealth and standard of living, than a positive one.